Substate dictatorship : networks, loyalty, and institutional change in the Soviet Union / Yoram Gorlizki and Oleg Khlevniuk
Publication details: New Haven ; London : Yale University Press , 2020 Description: IX, 445 p. : il. ; 24 cmISBN: 9780300230819Subject(s): Regímenes autoritarios | Liderazgo político | Control social | Historia de la URSSAbstract: How do local leaders govern in a large dictatorship? What resources do they draw on? Building on recent innovations in the theory of dictatorship, Yoram Gorlizki and Oleg Khlevniuk examine these questions by looking at one of the most important authoritarian regimes of the twentieth century. They show how Soviet regional leaders, lacking Stalin’s direct access to the means of repression, resorted to alternative strategies—especially through political exclusion and control of information—to build the local networks they needed to rule. The authors suggest that making sense of these networks is key to understanding how the dictatorship as a whole operated. Analytical scrutiny provides important clues to how the institutions of dictatorship changed over time, how conflicts within it were resolved, and how certain central policies, such as on the management of ethnic diversity, were implemented.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Monografías
|
Biblioteca Central del MAEC Depósito | 60870 | Available | 1077889 |
Bibliografía (p. 397-428)
How do local leaders govern in a large dictatorship? What resources do they draw on? Building on recent innovations in the theory of dictatorship, Yoram Gorlizki and Oleg Khlevniuk examine these questions by looking at one of the most important authoritarian regimes of the twentieth century. They show how Soviet regional leaders, lacking Stalin’s direct access to the means of repression, resorted to alternative strategies—especially through political exclusion and control of information—to build the local networks they needed to rule. The authors suggest that making sense of these networks is key to understanding how the dictatorship as a whole operated. Analytical scrutiny provides important clues to how the institutions of dictatorship changed over time, how conflicts within it were resolved, and how certain central policies, such as on the management of ethnic diversity, were implemented.