BIBLIOTECAS del MAEC

Amazon cover image
Image from Amazon.com

Legitimate targets? : social construction, international law and US Bombing / Janina Dill

By: Series: Cambridge Studies in International Relations ; 133 | Cambridge Studies in International Relations ; ; 133Publication details: Cambridge : Cambridge University Press , 2015Edition: 1st edDescription: 358 p. ; 23 cmISBN:
  • 978-1-107-69486-6
Subject(s):
Partial contents:
The challenge -- The theory -- Positive law -- Customary law -- The rise of international law in US air warfare -- The changing logic of US air warfare -- The behavioural relevance of international law in US air warfare -- The lack of normative success of international law in US air warfare -- The impossibility of normative success for international law in war
Abstract: Based on an innovative theory of international law, Janina Dill's book investigates the effectiveness of international humanitarian law (IHL) in regulating the conduct of warfare. Through a comprehensive examination of the IHL defining a legitimate target of attack, Dill reveals a controversy among legal and military professionals about the 'logic' according to which belligerents ought to balance humanitarian and military imperatives: the logics of sufficiency or efficiency. Law prescribes the former, but increased recourse to IL in US air warfare has led to targeting in accordance with the logic of efficiency
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Status Date due Barcode
Monografías Monografías Biblioteca Central del MAEC Depósito 55608 Available 1063956

Bibliografia: p. 311-348

The challenge -- The theory -- Positive law -- Customary law -- The rise of international law in US air warfare -- The changing logic of US air warfare -- The behavioural relevance of international law in US air warfare -- The lack of normative success of international law in US air warfare -- The impossibility of normative success for international law in war

Based on an innovative theory of international law, Janina Dill's book investigates the effectiveness of international humanitarian law (IHL) in regulating the conduct of warfare. Through a comprehensive examination of the IHL defining a legitimate target of attack, Dill reveals a controversy among legal and military professionals about the 'logic' according to which belligerents ought to balance humanitarian and military imperatives: the logics of sufficiency or efficiency. Law prescribes the former, but increased recourse to IL in US air warfare has led to targeting in accordance with the logic of efficiency

Gobierno de España
©Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores y de Cooperación

Powered by Koha